From Word-spotting to Oov Modeling

This paper explores one dimension along which word spotting and speech recognition differ: the nature of the background model. In word spotting, a relatively small number of keywords float on a sea of unknown words. In speech recognition, an occasional unknown word punctuates utterances that are otherwise completely invocabulary. Despite this difference in viewpoint, in some circumstances implementations of the two may become very similar. When transcribed data is available for a domain, word spotting benefits from the more detailed background model this can support [9]. The manner in which the background is modeled in these cases is reminiscent of speech recognition. For example, a large vocabulary with good coverage may be extracted from the corpus, so that relatively few words in an utterance remain unmodeled. In this case, the situation is qualitatively similar to OOV modeling in a conventional speech recognizer, except that the vocabulary is strictly divided into “filler” and “keyword”.